Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 23:00:01 GMT -5
The flow look like for the same period Lets find out. Heres Apples cash flow statement taken from page of its annual report In terms of structure its pretty similar to what weve seen with CoolGadget. Apples business is larger and more complex so it gives some more details. Depreciation and amortization for example means the company reduced its net income by writing down the value of assets but needs to add the money back here because it wasnt an actual cash outflow. And because its a public company it shows more details about issuance of stock.
But the overall layout is the same. As youd expect Apples cash Country Email List flow is a lot healthier than CoolGadgets. We saw in the income statement tutorial that Apples net income fell in for the first time in a decade but it still generated more than enough cash to pay for . billion of investments. And instead of tapping shareholders for more money it gave money back to them paying a whopping . billion dividend and repurchasing . billion of stock. At the end of the year Apple was left with a healthy billion in cash. And because it was still generating more than billion in cash every year from its main operations its outlook was very positive.
Even if it failed to sell as many iPads in future years it should cash flow. And it could easily dip into its existing cash or sell some of the billion in marketable securities it had on its balance sheet or borrow more or cut back on the amount it gave to shareholders. Whereas CoolGadgets cash flow statement showed us that it was in danger of suffering its own version of the credit crunch Apples made it look like a gigantic cashgenerating machine. . Variations The general layout of cash flow statements from different companies is usually.
But the overall layout is the same. As youd expect Apples cash Country Email List flow is a lot healthier than CoolGadgets. We saw in the income statement tutorial that Apples net income fell in for the first time in a decade but it still generated more than enough cash to pay for . billion of investments. And instead of tapping shareholders for more money it gave money back to them paying a whopping . billion dividend and repurchasing . billion of stock. At the end of the year Apple was left with a healthy billion in cash. And because it was still generating more than billion in cash every year from its main operations its outlook was very positive.
Even if it failed to sell as many iPads in future years it should cash flow. And it could easily dip into its existing cash or sell some of the billion in marketable securities it had on its balance sheet or borrow more or cut back on the amount it gave to shareholders. Whereas CoolGadgets cash flow statement showed us that it was in danger of suffering its own version of the credit crunch Apples made it look like a gigantic cashgenerating machine. . Variations The general layout of cash flow statements from different companies is usually.